Thursday, September 1, 2016

Mobile data indicator?

Hi,

I don't really like the way Android (in fact CM13.0) handles the mobile data in the status bar. If I have both WLAN and LTE enabled, I have absolutely no notification that the mobile data is enabled. Then, if I lose the WLAN connection, the mobile data will be automatically used. I have a small network plan so I'd like to avoid it.

The solution would be a status bar icon showing up whenever cellular data is on, whether or not the real connection is WLAN or cellular, on the right side of the status bar, just as all the system icons.

First of all: has anyone already written something like that?

If not: I'd like to create such an application. I know that the right side of the status bar is reserved for system apps. Does it mean that if I install the app, spawning the status bar icon, as a system app, it'll automatically be shown on the right side of the screen?

Besides, is it possible to create a status bar icon without a notification in the notification list?

Thanks for answering newbie questions :)


from xda-developers http://ift.tt/2bWg70E
via IFTTT
Hi,

I don't really like the way Android (in fact CM13.0) handles the mobile data in the status bar. If I have both WLAN and LTE enabled, I have absolutely no notification that the mobile data is enabled. Then, if I lose the WLAN connection, the mobile data will be automatically used. I have a small network plan so I'd like to avoid it.

The solution would be a status bar icon showing up whenever cellular data is on, whether or not the real connection is WLAN or cellular, on the right side of the status bar, just as all the system icons.

First of all: has anyone already written something like that?

If not: I'd like to create such an application. I know that the right side of the status bar is reserved for system apps. Does it mean that if I install the app, spawning the status bar icon, as a system app, it'll automatically be shown on the right side of the screen?

Besides, is it possible to create a status bar icon without a notification in the notification list?

Thanks for answering newbie questions :)


from xda-developers http://ift.tt/2bWg70E
via IFTTT

I phone music player

Can I get a cracked version of I phone music player

Sent from my XT907 using Tapatalk


from xda-developers http://ift.tt/2bMy6Uc
via IFTTT
Can I get a cracked version of I phone music player

Sent from my XT907 using Tapatalk


from xda-developers http://ift.tt/2bMy6Uc
via IFTTT

Can Someone Comment On Audio Quality?

Music audio quality via Aux and Bluetooth are key for me. I need to know if it's true that the new Note 7 with the 820 supports the same quality that is in the HTC 10. I was reading some posts elsewhere that the Note 7 has some new drivers that are different than the S7 and should be the same quality as the HTC 10. I currently own the 10 and love it, but mostly because of the Boomsound/Audio quality when listening to music. But I really love Sammy's OLED display and Camera.


from xda-developers http://ift.tt/2bWgeJJ
via IFTTT
Music audio quality via Aux and Bluetooth are key for me. I need to know if it's true that the new Note 7 with the 820 supports the same quality that is in the HTC 10. I was reading some posts elsewhere that the Note 7 has some new drivers that are different than the S7 and should be the same quality as the HTC 10. I currently own the 10 and love it, but mostly because of the Boomsound/Audio quality when listening to music. But I really love Sammy's OLED display and Camera.


from xda-developers http://ift.tt/2bWgeJJ
via IFTTT

Wednesday, August 31, 2016

samsung GT I9I00 S2 ANDROID 6.0 ROM SLIM6 ...HELP ME TO ROOTING

I have an samsung GT I9I00 S2 ANDROID 6.0 ROM SLIM6 what exactly do i need to ROOT MY PHONE?:rolleyes:


from xda-developers http://ift.tt/2cePzan
via IFTTT
I have an samsung GT I9I00 S2 ANDROID 6.0 ROM SLIM6 what exactly do i need to ROOT MY PHONE?:rolleyes:


from xda-developers http://ift.tt/2cePzan
via IFTTT

please help in unlocking Lte

Please help me in unlocking Sony Xperia c3 dual d2502 Lte
With clear steps
Thanks in advance


from xda-developers http://ift.tt/2c4LAvb
via IFTTT
Please help me in unlocking Sony Xperia c3 dual d2502 Lte
With clear steps
Thanks in advance


from xda-developers http://ift.tt/2c4LAvb
via IFTTT

Launcher or theme with rounded folders in the middle of the screen ???

Hello together, i need your help :)
I use nova launcher with OP3. The only thing i do not linke is the look of the folders.
I am looking for an Theme, Launcher or what ever, which shows the folder in the middle of the screen with rounded corners
(similar to EMUI or iphone).
Do you have an idea how I could get this?
Here an example: at the bottom of the site (http://ift.tt/2c4KyiH)

I tried EMUI Launcher but it is not as in the previews (it is more like nova standard)


from xda-developers http://ift.tt/2ceQrf3
via IFTTT
Hello together, i need your help :)
I use nova launcher with OP3. The only thing i do not linke is the look of the folders.
I am looking for an Theme, Launcher or what ever, which shows the folder in the middle of the screen with rounded corners
(similar to EMUI or iphone).
Do you have an idea how I could get this?
Here an example: at the bottom of the site (http://ift.tt/2c4KyiH)

I tried EMUI Launcher but it is not as in the previews (it is more like nova standard)


from xda-developers http://ift.tt/2ceQrf3
via IFTTT

[Mandatory] XDA-Developers and the GPL

XDA-DEVELOPERS AND THE GPL


Hello Everyone,

As many of you know, here at XDA we have strict policy regarding GPL v2. What you may not understand is what that means and what effects it may have on you. Simply put "The GNU GPL is a software license agreement, under which parts of the Android operating system are licensed. The majority of Android is licensed under the Apache license, but the Linux Kernel (which is present in every running Android ROM in some shape or form) is licensed under the GPL (version 2)".


So what does this mean for the average user?

To keep things simple, this license is one of the reasons Android exists in the open source capacity that it does. It requires developers to keep their kernel source open and has created the community sharing programs that have made Android so wonderful.


If you are a developer what does this mean for you?

It doesn't matter if you are creating a whole rom or just the kernel, the process of being GPL compliant is a very simple one to explain. Basically, we expect you to either link the source that you have chosen to use or upload the source you have created into a format that can be viewed by everyone and anyone. Below are the 3 most common situations that developers run into when needing to stay GPL compliant under XDA rules.

1. If you are using a stock kernel you MUST mention where you obtained your source. Also, having a link leading to where the manufacture has uploaded their source is always helpful.

2. If you are using a community driven source build (e.g. CyanogenMod, AOSP, or Parandroid) or a singular developer's source you MUST link directly to the repository that contains the kernel for that specific device. If you are only linking to another thread or to a general repository, this will not be considered as being GPL compliant unless the code has not been modified.

3. If you are forking a repository that is similar to the examples listed above in #2, you MUST publish and link your entire kernel source. This includes any and all changes that you have made. Two of the most common ways developers publish their source on XDA is either with Gerrit, or GitHub. While these two methods are recommend, they are not the only routes you can choose to accomplish this. All that is required is that the source can be viewed and downloaded by anyone who wishes to do so. When releasing an update, your repository must be updated the moment you release your kernel on XDA. If you can post your update to XDA, there should be no reason as to why you cannot release your source.


What if the manufacture for my device has not released their kernel source?

In a perfect world this would not happen but unfortunately this is not the case. Pulser-G2 recently wrote a portal article explaining a certain situation that has come across our desks.


With all of that being said I will leave you with this...

By posting your work on XDA-Developers, you are agreeing that it complies with relevant licensing conditions. As such, by posting a kernel or other work containing GPL code, you are confirming to us that you have made this source code available publicly under the GPL. Failure to follow this policy will result in the closure of your thread and the removal of the download links.





from xda-developers http://ift.tt/2ceQ8kx
via IFTTT
XDA-DEVELOPERS AND THE GPL


Hello Everyone,

As many of you know, here at XDA we have strict policy regarding GPL v2. What you may not understand is what that means and what effects it may have on you. Simply put "The GNU GPL is a software license agreement, under which parts of the Android operating system are licensed. The majority of Android is licensed under the Apache license, but the Linux Kernel (which is present in every running Android ROM in some shape or form) is licensed under the GPL (version 2)".


So what does this mean for the average user?

To keep things simple, this license is one of the reasons Android exists in the open source capacity that it does. It requires developers to keep their kernel source open and has created the community sharing programs that have made Android so wonderful.


If you are a developer what does this mean for you?

It doesn't matter if you are creating a whole rom or just the kernel, the process of being GPL compliant is a very simple one to explain. Basically, we expect you to either link the source that you have chosen to use or upload the source you have created into a format that can be viewed by everyone and anyone. Below are the 3 most common situations that developers run into when needing to stay GPL compliant under XDA rules.

1. If you are using a stock kernel you MUST mention where you obtained your source. Also, having a link leading to where the manufacture has uploaded their source is always helpful.

2. If you are using a community driven source build (e.g. CyanogenMod, AOSP, or Parandroid) or a singular developer's source you MUST link directly to the repository that contains the kernel for that specific device. If you are only linking to another thread or to a general repository, this will not be considered as being GPL compliant unless the code has not been modified.

3. If you are forking a repository that is similar to the examples listed above in #2, you MUST publish and link your entire kernel source. This includes any and all changes that you have made. Two of the most common ways developers publish their source on XDA is either with Gerrit, or GitHub. While these two methods are recommend, they are not the only routes you can choose to accomplish this. All that is required is that the source can be viewed and downloaded by anyone who wishes to do so. When releasing an update, your repository must be updated the moment you release your kernel on XDA. If you can post your update to XDA, there should be no reason as to why you cannot release your source.


What if the manufacture for my device has not released their kernel source?

In a perfect world this would not happen but unfortunately this is not the case. Pulser-G2 recently wrote a portal article explaining a certain situation that has come across our desks.


With all of that being said I will leave you with this...

By posting your work on XDA-Developers, you are agreeing that it complies with relevant licensing conditions. As such, by posting a kernel or other work containing GPL code, you are confirming to us that you have made this source code available publicly under the GPL. Failure to follow this policy will result in the closure of your thread and the removal of the download links.





from xda-developers http://ift.tt/2ceQ8kx
via IFTTT